Trust is a vulnerability
The “trust us” trap
Most collaboration tools—Slack, Notion, Asana—operate on managed trust. They hold the keys to your data. That lets them offer convenience:
- password resets
- server-side search
- indexing and “smart” suggestions
- compliance exports and admin visibility
Those features are real. The cost is usually hidden. Because if a platform can read your data, it can also leak your data—accidentally or on purpose.
When a company says, “We take your privacy seriously,” what they often mean is:
“We can read everything you write—but we promise not to.”
That promise is weak. Not because people are evil. Because reality is.
Trust fails in predictable ways
Your security shouldn’t depend on the integrity of a CEO or the goodwill of a sysadmin. Even a well-intentioned company can betray you through forces it can’t control:
- Acquisition - the founders sell to a data-hungry giant
- Pressure - laws change, regulators tighten, compliance expands
- Access - a single rogue employee slips through
- Breach - an attacker gets in and exports the crown jewels
- Drift - the product roadmap shifts from “privacy-first” to “growth-first"
If your data is readable on their servers, your confidentiality is always one incident away from becoming a headline.
“Don’t Be Evil” vs “Can’t Be Evil”
At Qaxa, we don’t ask for your trust. We designed a system where trust isn’t needed.
Qaxa is built on zero-knowledge architecture. In plain language, that means:
- You generate the keys on your device, not on our servers.
- You hold the keys. We never see your password or recovery phrase.
- We store ciphertext. What reaches our servers is scrambled junk.
- We can’t read your messages.
- We can’t read your notes.
- We can’t open your files.
This is the difference between:
- “Don’t be evil.” (a promise)
- “Can’t be evil.” (a constraint)
We chose constraints.
We couldn’t betray you if we tried
The most underrated security feature is the simplest one:
If we don’t have your keys, we can’t give up your data.
If a government agency knocks on our door in Prague and demands your content, we can open the servers. They’ll find encrypted shards. That’s it.
No readable messages.
No readable files.
No notes to browse.
No “export everything” button.
Not even under pressure.
Because we never had the keys. That’s not bravado. It’s architecture.
Math doesn’t bend
We removed the human element from the security equation and replaced it with something stronger: mathematics.
Modern cryptography doesn’t care:
- who owns the company
- what the political climate looks like
- what jurisdiction you’re in
- what someone “requests” in an email marked urgent
Encryption isn’t a policy. It’s physics.
We use proven, battle-tested primitives (PGP encryption) to make sure your work stays yours—even when the world gets noisy.
Who this is for
In today’s environment, “trusting a platform” is a luxury.
High-stakes operators can’t afford it:
- lawyers
- journalists
- crypto teams
- researchers
- founders with sensitive IP
- freelancers handling client work that must not leak
If your work has real consequences, “we promise” is not a security model.
What Zero-Knowledge does (and doesn’t) mean
Zero-knowledge means we can’t read your content. That’s the point.
It doesn’t mean the internet disappears.
Like any online service, we may still have to process limited account and operational data (for example: signup email, billing details if you pay, and basic network logs needed to run and protect the service).
The line we do not cross is the one that matters: Your content stays encrypted end-to-end. Your keys stay yours.
Stop renting your security. Own it.
If your security depends on trust, you’re not secure. You’re exposed. Stop looking for companies you can trust. Start looking for software that doesn’t need it.
Qaxa is your operator’s license for the digital age. Stop renting your security. Start owning it.
